In article <5ii2dl$4ud$1@gulfa.kuwait.net>,
rferdy@kuwait.net (Rudy Fernandes) wrote:
Correction and clarification.
> With 6 logs in my test instance, OL invariably
>aborted when the transaction moved into the x+4 log. It did not
>matter whether the Tx started at 5% of log x or 95% of log x.
With LTXHWM=50 and LTXEHWM=60 and 6 logs, OL aborted when
the transaction (which I made sure progressed slowly) moved into
x+3, irrespective of where the Tx commenced in x.
-----------------------
Rudy Fernandes
GIC, Kuwait
OL 7.20UC4, 4GL 6.04UC1
-----------------------