Mark Jamison said:
> A small, medium, large, XL, XXL type of onconfig offering is definitely a
> point to be considered, however a question I would ask regarding that, is
> why?
See below.
> The reason I ask is because onconfig.std should really meant to be a
> template.
Because it's not used as a template, it's used as gospel.
--
Bye now,
Obnoxio
"I'm astonished anyone pays real money for this crap."
-- Cosmo
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by OpenProtect(http://www.openprotect.com), and is
believed to be clean.