Translating with DrWatson… this can take a few seconds the first time.
This is a genuine, complex translation. DrWatson protects commands, error codes, and log output while naturally translating the surrounding text. It’s translated once and saved.
Obnoxio The Clown asked what technology transfers from Informix to DB2. Madison Pruet said quite a bit, citing sequences and GLS Unicode upgrades in IDS 9.4 and more DB2 features planned for 9.5. Serge Rielau cited sequences and INSTEAD OF triggers. Obnoxio and Andy Kent were unimpressed by sequences versus SERIAL. Discussion only.
Auto-generated by Claude from the posts below — may be imperfect; read the full thread.
Serge Rielau wrote:
> Barbara,
>
> 1. My boss is from Informix
> 2. I spend a good deal of my time interacting with the Informix
> developers who transfer technology into DB2.
And how much time is spent transferring technology in the other
direction...?
--
"C'est pas parce qu'on n'a rien ' dire qu'il faut fermer sa gueule"
- Coluche
↪ replying to Obnoxio The Clown
Madison Pruet — — source: Usenet: comp.databases.informix
Actually quite a bit.
In 9.4 the sequence, the gls upgrades for unicode. In 9.5 there are several
DB2 features that are being incorporated into IDS. Since 9.5 is not yet in
beta, it's a bit too early to talk about specifics. But there are several
DB2 features that are being put into IDS.
However, the problems that have to be resolved with the DB2 product are
significantly different than the things that need to be resolved in IDS.
This is mainly due to the fundamental differences in the architecture and
administration of the two products.
M.P.
"Obnoxio The Clown" <obnoxio@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:bvjc7u$sgvai$2@ID-64669.news.uni-berlin.de...
> Serge Rielau wrote:
>
> > Barbara,
> >
> > 1. My boss is from Informix
> > 2. I spend a good deal of my time interacting with the Informix
> > developers who transfer technology into DB2.
>
> And how much time is spent transferring technology in the other
> direction...?
>
> --
> "C'est pas parce qu'on n'a rien ' dire qu'il faut fermer sa gueule"
> - Coluche
Sequences, Instead of triggers. Both in IDS 9.4
I don't know about what's going on under the hood, but DB2's and
IDS'/XPS' optimizers have very different strengths. A lot they can learn
from each other.
Cheers
Serge
--
Serge Rielau
DB2 SQL Compiler Development
IBM Toronto Lab
Serge Rielau wrote:
> Sequences, Instead of triggers. Both in IDS 9.4
> I don't know about what's going on under the hood, but DB2's and
> IDS'/XPS' optimizers have very different strengths. A lot they can learn
> from each other.
Having seen some of what DB2's optimiser does, I'm not entirely convinced
I'd like to see IDS or XPS learn from it. :o)
Sequences are a minor goodness, although as a 20-year SERIAL veteran, I'm
not entirely sure it is that much of a win.
--
"C'est pas parce qu'on n'a rien ''' dire qu'il faut fermer sa gueule"
- Coluche
↪ replying to Obnoxio The Clown
Andy Kent — — source: Usenet: comp.databases.informix
Obnoxio The Clown <obnoxio@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<bvl055
...
> Sequences are a minor goodness, although as a 20-year SERIAL veteran, I'm
> not entirely sure it is that much of a win.
It isn't really. AFAICT It's just to be compatible with Orifice, who
never got round to inventing simple things like SERIAL.
Andy
We use strictly necessary cookies to make this site work. With your
consent we’d also use optional cookies for analytics and marketing. You can accept all,
reject all, or choose. Read our Cookie Policy.