Re: Year 2000 is NOT a leap year
Posted in 1997
In article <5q0jgu$125$1@wetware.wetware.com>, cse@news.wetware.com writes: > > Gee, I didn't read into John's comment any sort of *tone*. > Perception. > He said please. How about this: Please shut the hell up. Is that acceptable? Of course not... but I think you see my point eh? > Perhaps you are just being defensive because > you made a very sloppy public mistake. I'm not sure which part leads you to believe that I'm defensive. I'm not the one telling people to take a remedial course, I'm not the one justifying my childish rants... If you want to talk about professionalism perhaps by example is a good way to go. wtf -- Pablo Sanchez | wk: 415.933.3812| pg: 800.930.5635 -or- pablo_p@pager.sgi.com --------------+-----------------+-------------------------------------------- pablo@sgi.com ... when mailing me, place "not spam" in the Subject