Re: Informix Directions

David Williams wrote: > In article <34E133F1.CE128AD4@NOSPAM.KingofMyDomain.MAPSON.Segel.com>, > Michael Segel <Mikey@NOSPAM.KingofMyDomain.MAPSON.Segel.com> writes > > > > > >David Williams while sitting in his opium den wrote: > > > >> In article <34DEDF24.BC5AA1C8@segel.NO.SPAM.KINGOFMYDOMAIN.SPAM.NO.com>, > >> Michael Segel <mikey@segel.NO.SPAM.KINGOFMYDOMAIN.SPAM.NO.com> writes > >> >Hmmmm, > >> >I always thought that Informix's site was there just to toot their > >> >own horn. ;-) Of course the techinfo site is managed by a different > >> >group and has always been out of date hence worthless. > >> > > >> Psst! Wrong, it includes Online 7.24 and 9.12, the latest releases... > >> > > > >Hmmm, OK, try using the site. ;-) Oh, and try finding 7.24 on SCO. > >[Hint. It aint there. Why is that? ;-] > > > > > It's not out yet, SCO is one of the last platforms ported to. > > Informix port to >200 platforms and SCO is so sh*t that it is > one of the last ones ported to. > > PS I've heard a rumour that SCO UNIX will no longer exist soon, > can anyone confirm this? > Gee what took you so long? I wuz wundering when you'd catch on. So what's Informix's low end system? NT? [That still means NOT THERE ;-] BTW, the port list is down to 12 or 14 now. One of the problems, and if someone could correct me, please do. I am under the assumption that Informix doesn't have accurate demographics as to who is using their systems. Also there are a lot of systems which don't have support and are running 5.X on SCO. So what happens to them? -Shakespearean fool.