Translating with DrWatson… this can take a few seconds the first time.
This is a genuine, complex translation. DrWatson protects commands, error codes, and log output while naturally translating the surrounding text. It’s translated once and saved.
Off-topic discussion started by Art Kagel's remark that English is an unexpressive language. Ian Wilson countered with English literary greats and noted the Oxford dictionary lists 'verboten' as English. Art said Yiddish words like Oi! have more expressive power; Neil Truby offered Australian slang examples. try_and_err thanked Ian for the link. No Informix content.
Auto-generated by Claude from the posts below — may be imperfect; read the full thread.
Ian Wilson — — source: Usenet: comp.databases.informix
Art S. Kagel wrote:
> English is such an unexpressive language. I just found verboten to be stronger than the
> appropriate English word which I guess would have been 'restricted' and
> 'forbidden' has a different connotation.
Blimey, when I read "English is such an unexpressive language" I felt so
gobsmacked, you could have knocked me down with a feather. Chaucer,
Shakespeare, Milton and Churchill must be spinning in their graves!
Anyway, The main authority on the English language says "verboten" is a
part of it. So, Art, you *are* expressing yourself in English!
http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/verboten
verboten
/verbot'n/
' adjective forbidden by an authority.
' ORIGIN German.
↪ replying to Ian Wilson
Art S. Kagel — — source: Usenet: comp.databases.informix
Ian Wilson wrote:
> Art S. Kagel wrote:
>
>> English is such an unexpressive language. I just found verboten to be
>> stronger than the appropriate English word which I guess would have
>> been 'restricted' and 'forbidden' has a different connotation.
>
>
> Blimey, when I read "English is such an unexpressive language" I felt so
> gobsmacked, you could have knocked me down with a feather. Chaucer,
> Shakespeare, Milton and Churchill must be spinning in their graves!
No, Shakespeare, etc. were wonderfully expressive writers. The difference
is that in an expressive language like Yiddish, Chinese, or Russian anyone
can be expressive. Face it there's just no English word with the expressive
power of the single Yiddish Oi! or Shlemeil! I could write pages on the
connotative content in either of those words if I had to write it in English.
Art S. Kagel
> Anyway, The main authority on the English language says "verboten" is a
> part of it. So, Art, you *are* expressing yourself in English!
>
> http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/verboten
>
> verboten
>
> /verbot'n/
>
> ' adjective forbidden by an authority.
>
> ' ORIGIN German.
↪ replying to Art S. Kagel
Neil Truby — — source: Usenet: comp.databases.informix
"Art S. Kagel" <kagel@bloomberg.net> wrote in message
news:42A8A679.4090709@bloomberg.net...
> Ian Wilson wrote:
>> Art S. Kagel wrote:
>>
> No, Shakespeare, etc. were wonderfully expressive writers. The difference
> is that in an expressive language like Yiddish, Chinese, or Russian anyone
> can be expressive. Face it there's just no English word with the
> expressive power of the single Yiddish Oi! or Shlemeil! I could write
> pages on the connotative content in either of those words if I had to
> write it in English.
Similarly with Australian English. I've never really been able to define
adequately the complexity of the metaphoric (rather than literal!) meaning
of the Australian adjective "daggy" (as in "Maria, why are you wearing such
daggy shoes with that suit?").
When I lived in Australia the federal (or was it state?) government ran a
poster campaign encouraging citizens to report social security cheats to the
authorities under the slogan "Dob in a Bludger". No-one can match
Australians for irreverence and informailty, even by officialdom!
Peace.
Thanks for your link, that's a good explanation (also for possible
future question).
Regards,
try_and_err
Ian Wilson schrieb:
> Art S. Kagel wrote:
> > English is such an unexpressive language. I just found verboten to be stronger than the
> > appropriate English word which I guess would have been 'restricted' and
> > 'forbidden' has a different connotation.
>
> Blimey, when I read "English is such an unexpressive language" I felt so
> gobsmacked, you could have knocked me down with a feather. Chaucer,
> Shakespeare, Milton and Churchill must be spinning in their graves!
>
> Anyway, The main authority on the English language says "verboten" is a
> part of it. So, Art, you *are* expressing yourself in English!
>
> http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/verboten
>
> verboten
>
> /verbot'n/
>
> · adjective forbidden by an authority.
>
> - ORIGIN German.
We use strictly necessary cookies to make this site work. With your
consent we’d also use optional cookies for analytics and marketing. You can accept all,
reject all, or choose. Read our Cookie Policy.