RE: Dynamically allocated new shared memory segment ???!!!
Posted in 1999
Topics: Server Administration, Platform-Specific Issues
> >In a web datablade page an MISQL statement tries to select from
> a table and
> >gets back too many results for the webdatablade to handle.
I had the problem above. I was able to fix it by adding
MI_WEBMAXHTMLSIZE n
to my web.cnf file, where n is some large number. At first I put in 200000
for n and it worked, but I eventually had to up the number.
Hope this helps.
-Debbie Donahue, UCSB/Bren School
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ius-users@iiug.org [mailto:owner-ius-users@iiug.org]On
> Behalf Of Thomas Tatum
> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 1999 9:10 AM
> To: ius-users@iiug.org
> Cc: jingker cheng; informix-list@iiug.org; Bmo@Koz. Com
> Subject: RE: Dynamically allocated new shared memory segment ???!!!
>
>
> we have: web.3.32.UC4
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-ius-users@iiug.org [mailto:owner-ius-users@iiug.org]On
> > Behalf Of Willow Williams
> > Sent: Thursday, August 19, 1999 11:57 AM
> > To: ius-users@iiug.org
> > Cc: jingker cheng; informix-list@iiug.org; Ius-Users@Iiug. Org; Bmo@Koz.
> > Com
> > Subject: RE: Dynamically allocated new shared memory segment ???!!!
> >
> >
> > What version of the web datablade are they using?
> >
> > Willow
> >
> > At 08:13 AM 8/19/99 , Thomas Tatum wrote:
> > >Yes, we have seen this with IUS 9.14 and the Webdatablade.
> Except in our
> > >case it would keep allocating until the server ran out of
> shared memory.
> > >
> > >In a web datablade page an MISQL statement tries to select from
> > a table and
> > >gets back too many results for the webdatablade to handle. We
> would see
> > >behavior similar to this.
> > >
> > >Another strange side effect when this would happen, is we would run
> > >onstat -g seg and inspect the shared memory segments that were> > allocated and
> > >on each of the ones that were created within seconds the blkused
> > was only 5
> > >and blkfree was always very large. Until we rooted out the
> problem (the
> > >MISQL was too ambitious) we would run onmode -F to free these
> > segments that
> > >were just created.
> > >
> > >Does anyone know if this is an informix bug? and if there is a fix?
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: owner-informix-list@iiug.org
> > >> [mailto:owner-informix-list@iiug.org]On Behalf Of jingker cheng
> > >> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 1999 8:43 AM
> > >> To: informix-list@iiug.org
> > >> Subject: Dynamically allocated new shared memory segment ???!!!
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Dear ALL :
> > >>
> > >> Our system appear the following messages in seconds :
> > >>
> > >> 09:11:02 dynamically allocated new shared memory segment
> > (size 8388608)
> > >>
> > >> 09:11:30 dynamically allocated new shared memory segment
> > (size 8388608)
> > >>
> > >> 09:11:50 dynamically allocated new shared memory segment
> > (size 8388608)
> > >>
> > >> 09:12:02 dynamically allocated new shared memory segment
> > (size 8388608)
> > >>
> > >> 09:12:27 dynamically allocated new shared memory segment
> > (size 8388608)
> > >>
> > >> 09:12:55 dynamically allocated new shared memory segment
> > (size 8388608)
> > >>
> > >> 09:13:17 dynamically allocated new shared memory segment
> > (size 8388608)> > >>
> > >> ......
> > >> .....
> > >> .....
> > >>
> > >> Does anyone know what kind of process will cause the results
> ? How can
> > >> I determine which process/session cause such results ? Thanks ....
> > >> Our system is HP-UX 10.20 and Informix On-Line Dynamic Server 7.22UC3
> > >>
> > >> Jung-Hui Cheng
> > >> cheng@dbtel.com.tw
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
>
>
Related threads
- Posting from the Informix-list
- Migrating from IDS 9.40.UC6 to 11.50.UC3
- Ip for a network session
- questions onstat -g