Translating with DrWatson… this can take a few seconds the first time.
This is a genuine, complex translation. DrWatson protects commands, error codes, and log output while naturally translating the surrounding text. It’s translated once and saved.
Jorg Rueschenschmidt asked whether PDQ helps on a single-processor system or whether PDQ_MAXPRIORITY should be set to 0. Neil Truby said multi-core CPUs may benefit but on an old single-core machine context-switching could outweigh gains. scottishpoet said parallel disk access can help, balanced against the ready queue. Andreas Legner warned of memory limits without PDQ and suggested DS_NONPDQ_QUERY_MEM from 10.00 or 9.40. No definitive answer.
Auto-generated by Claude from the posts below — may be imperfect; read the full thread.
Hi,
can sombody tell me if I can benefit from PDQ on single processor system ?
According Informix performance guide, multiple treads are started when
when PDQ is used, but can i benefit from this wif one physical processor
is available only ? I am afraid the extra work to manage the multiple
threads will be bad for the overall Informix performance on a single
processor system ?
Is it better to set PDQ_MAXPRIORITY to 0 in case a single processor
system is used ?
Any experience ?
Regards ...
Joerg
↪ replying to =?ISO-8859-15?Q?J=C3=B6rg_R=C31/4schenschmidt?=
Neil Truby — — source: Usenet: comp.databases.informix
Possibly it depends upon your hardware. Multi-cored and multi-threaded
processors possibly would benefit from multiple cpu vps, but wih an elderly,
single-core, single processor your concern that you may lose more on the
swings of conext switching than you gain on the roundabouts of Informix
parallel processing may well be founded.
--
Neil Truby t:01932 724027
Director m:07798 811708
Ardenta Limited e:neil.truby@ardenta.com
"Jörg R'1/4schenschmidt" <jrueschenschmidt@t-online.de> wrote in message
news:ehv3q4$1qp$00$1@news.t-online.com...
> Hi,
>
> can sombody tell me if I can benefit from PDQ on single processor system ?
>
> According Informix performance guide, multiple treads are started when
> when PDQ is used, but can i benefit from this wif one physical processor
> is available only ? I am afraid the extra work to manage the multiple
> threads will be bad for the overall Informix performance on a single
> processor system ?
>
> Is it better to set PDQ_MAXPRIORITY to 0 in case a single processor system
> is used ?
>
> Any experience ?
>
> Regards ...
>
> Joerg
↪ replying to =?ISO-8859-15?Q?J=C3=B6rg_R=C31/4schenschmidt?=
I think if you have multiple disks then more then the disks can be
accessed in parallel rather than serially. Its then a balance point of
how busy the ready Q becomes to process the data returned from the
disks 2 disks may be OK, 10 may swamp the the ready Q
Jörg RÃ1/4schenschmidt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> can sombody tell me if I can benefit from PDQ on single processor system ?
>
> According Informix performance guide, multiple treads are started when
> when PDQ is used, but can i benefit from this wif one physical processor
> is available only ? I am afraid the extra work to manage the multiple
> threads will be bad for the overall Informix performance on a single
> processor system ?
>
> Is it better to set PDQ_MAXPRIORITY to 0 in case a single processor
> system is used ?
>
> Any experience ?
>
> Regards ...
>
> Joerg
↪ replying to =?ISO-8859-15?Q?J=C3=B6rg_R=C31/4schenschmidt?=
Andreas Legner — — source: Usenet: comp.databases.informix
Don't underestimate the memory restrictions when not using PDQ_PRIORITY.
Still when using version 10.00 or later 9.40s, DS_NONPDQ_QUERY_MEM can also help out here.
Regards,
Andreas
Your privacy choices
We use strictly necessary cookies to make this site work. With your
consent we’d also use optional cookies for analytics and marketing. You can accept all,
reject all, or choose. Read our Cookie Policy.