Re: Informix won't buy Borland

In article <3rlfut$25j@amgen.amgen.com>, rbaumann@amgen.com (Richard Lee Baumann) wrote: > In article <3rh3lu$cs5@southern.co.nz>, Richard Maurice <rmm@southern.co.nz> writes: > |> Informix won't buy Borland because: > |> > |> (some stuff deleted) > |> > |> 4. Infobor would be a really bad name for a company. > > But Borlix wouldn't be so bad, don't you think? It sounds almost like a > conjunction of Boraxo and Ajax. For software that runs cleaner than its > competition. It also sounds like something you'd read about on alt.sex.bestiality ! P.S. There's nothing runs cleaner than a few lines of null code. > > -- > Richard Baumann (805) 447-8391 > International Clinical Safety > AMGEN > --------------------------------------------------------------- > The opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the author.