Re: File System , I/O performance.

Cesar: That matches my own testing indicating that EXT2 should be the filesystem of choice for database chunks. In this test it dramatically outperformed all other filesystem types on Linux except JFS and only when the JFS journal was written to a virtual drive in memory. Art Art S. Kagel Advanced DataTools (www.advancedatatools.com) Blog: http://informix-myview.blogspot.com/ Disclaimer: Please keep in mind that my own opinions are my own opinions and do not reflect on my employer, Advanced DataTools, the IIUG, nor any other organization with which I am associated either explicitly, implicitly, or by inference. Neither do those opinions reflect those of other individuals affiliated with any entity with which I am affiliated nor those of the entities themselves. On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Cesar Inacio Martins < cesar.inacio.martins@gmail.com> wrote: > Sharing... > > Studying about JFS , found this nice database microbenchmark from OpenLDAP > project... > There is no big player here... only lightweight databases. > > What caught my attention is the JFS performance at FS test , "without" the > journaling overhead. > > The comparison is with : btrfs, ext2, ext3, ext4, jfs, ntfs, reiserfs, > xfs, and zfs (Linux) > > http://symas.com/mdb/microbench/july/index.html#sec11 > > Just as nice information . > > Regards > Cesar > > _______________________________________________ > Informix-list mailing list > Informix-list@iiug.org > http://www.iiug.org/mailman/listinfo/informix-list > > --047d7b3438009d054104d97d6d3d