Re: 9.40 buggy? NOT !

Hi, not buggy ?!? My opinion is the opposite... In the last three months I had 5(!) calls open at TechSupport. The results are 3 oficial Bug Reports: Bug: 164853 SERVER CRASH OR INDEX CORRUPTION OCCURED WHEN BTSCANNER THREAD AND LOGRECOVERY RUNNING IN PARALLEL Bug: 164873 PHYSICAL LOGGING NOT IN CRITICAL SECTION MESSAGES IN AF FILE WHEN ATTEMPTING TO DO CERTAIN OPERATIONS IN BTSCANNER THREAD Bug: 164714 ONPLOAD DATABASE NOT UPGRADED DURING UPGRADE OF 9.40.UC1/UC2 TO 9.40.UC2W1 AND LATER At the moment 1 open call and it is probable a new bug :-( Johann Michael Krzepkowski wrote: > Found one bug on Linux: > create table with extent size way over what was available > on the disk crashed the engine. Corrected the problem and> loaded 30 GB database OK. > > Michael > > Rich Campbell wrote: > >>Folks, >> >>We have experienced many problems while testing 9.40 for a mission critical >>application. We can not execute our >>load test without crashing the engine. We will be pulling back to 7.31. >>Very disappointed in the Quality Control of 9.40 since IBM/Informix has been >>pushing it. >>Performance is about the same with our application. >> >>Better off on 7.31. >> >> > > -- ****************************************************** Tele Atlas Deutschland GmbH Dept: TA/FIT-DEU Am Neuen Horizont 1 D-31177 Harsum Tel: +49 5127 408-465 Fax: +49 5127 408-559 E-mail: Johann.Eggers@teleatlas.com ****************************************************** sending to informix-list