Translating with DrWatson… this can take a few seconds the first time.
This is a genuine, complex translation. DrWatson protects commands, error codes, and log output while naturally translating the surrounding text. It’s translated once and saved.
Pablo F. Herrero reported that after moving from IDS 7.30 to 7.31, syssesprof isreads, iswrites and isrewrites grew past a billion quickly, and the seqscans value was negative. Art S. Kagel suspected bad queries or a mis-set BUFFERS value; Pablo said BUFFERS was unchanged at 30000. Leonid Vorontsov suggested rebuilding sysmaster with buildsmi. No confirmation of a fix.
Auto-generated by Claude from the posts below — may be imperfect; read the full thread.
Hi all:
We used to control the sessions which were runnig with the table
"syssesprof" and the fields "isreads", "iswrites" and "isrewrites"
(...) when I had IDS 7.30. Now, we have a 7.31 but the values of that
fields take values over 1,000,000,000 very quickly. I think these
values are not in relation with the querys they are running.
Any idea about it?
Thanks in advance.
Pablo F Herrero Fernandez
Gijon
Asturias (Spain)
mailto:PabloF.Herrero@srrpa.es
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
↪ replying to pablof.herrero@srrpa.es
Art S. Kagel — — source: Informix-list mailing list archive (1991-1998)
pablof.herrero@srrpa.es wrote:
>
> Hi all:
> We used to control the sessions which were runnig with the table
> "syssesprof" and the fields "isreads", "iswrites" and "isrewrites"
> (...) when I had IDS 7.30. Now, we have a 7.31 but the values of that
> fields take values over 1,000,000,000 very quickly. I think these
> values are not in relation with the querys they are running.
> Any idea about it?
Or many of our queries need to be rewritten, indexes added, and statistics
updated. These fields should not behave any differently than they did under
7.31. Are you sure you have not done something careless like drop a zero
from your BUFFERS ONCONFIG parameter value so that you are thrashing the
buffer pool? What do your cache percentages look like?
Art S. Kagel
Hello Art:
For example, now my onstat -p tells me:
Profile
dskreads pagreads bufreads %cached dskwrits pagwrits bufwrits %cached
85355 10381006 541629 84.24 951 1228 14090 93.25
isamtot open start read write rewrite delete commit
rollbk
215653 6732 10213 131640 1628 5851 29 79
0
gp_read gp_write gp_rewrt gp_del gp_alloc gp_free gp_curs
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ovlock ovuserthread ovbuff usercpu syscpu numckpts flushes
0 0 0 108.38 66.48 15 294
bufwaits lokwaits lockreqs deadlks dltouts ckpwaits compress seqscans
5584 0 1344663 0 0 4 6 231
ixda-RA idx-RA da-RA RA-pgsused lchwaits
4294 1 44370 48653 160
And a values's session:
isreads iswrites isrewrites
512950274 1947860992 127598592
My BUFFERS ONCONFIG parameter value didn't change from IDS 7.30 and the
value is 30000 .
In the onstat -p we can read 231 seqscans but the seqscans session
value is -263454720. I believe it is a value out of range.
I don`t understand anything.
Thank you for your interest.
Pablo F. Herrero
In article <38595A31.E6CBD300@bloomberg.net>,
kagel@bloomberg.net wrote:
> pablof.herrero@srrpa.es wrote:
> >
> > Hi all:
> > We used to control the sessions which were runnig with the table
> > "syssesprof" and the fields "isreads", "iswrites" and "isrewrites"
> > (...) when I had IDS 7.30. Now, we have a 7.31 but the values of
that
> > fields take values over 1,000,000,000 very quickly. I think these
> > values are not in relation with the querys they are running.
> > Any idea about it?
>
> Or many of our queries need to be rewritten, indexes added, and
statistics
> updated. These fields should not behave any differently than they
did under
> 7.31. Are you sure you have not done something careless like drop a
zero
> from your BUFFERS ONCONFIG parameter value so that you are thrashing
the
> buffer pool? What do your cache percentages look like?
>
> Art S. Kagel
>
--
Pablo F Herrero Fernandez
Gijon
Asturias (Spain)
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
pablof.herrero@srrpa.es wrote:
> "syssesprof" and the fields "isreads", "iswrites" and "isrewrites"
> (...) when I had IDS 7.30. Now, we have a 7.31 but the values of that
> fields take values over 1,000,000,000 very quickly. I think these
> values are not in relation with the querys they are running.
> Any idea about it?
You must rebuild 'sysmaster' database using 'buildsmi' command i think.
> Pablo F Herrero Fernandez
Leonid Vorontsov
We use strictly necessary cookies to make this site work. With your
consent we’d also use optional cookies for analytics and marketing. You can accept all,
reject all, or choose. Read our Cookie Policy.