Re: {Spam?} RE: Can I optimize the engine here or do I have to get the developers to change the SQL?

Ian Michael Gumby wrote: > > > > Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 22:20:27 +0000 > > From: obnoxio@serendipita.com > > CC: informix-list@iiug.org > > Subject: Re: Can I optimize the engine here or do I have to get the > developers to change the SQL? > > > > Ian Michael Gumby wrote: > > > > > > The only other 'must have' feature would be to create a column > oriented > > > data type (re: HBase). This shouldn't be too hard to build on. > Something > > > similar to the time series datablade. > > > > Fuck. Off. > > > > Firstly, it's nothing like the fucking time series DataBlade and > > secondly, it's an affront against nature. > > > > Stick your HBase-alike into DB2, where it can sit alongside the equally > > immensely valuable and productive native XML support. > > > Ah, you don't really know how the time series datablade works, do you? > So if you think about it, a column oriented datablade would use a lot of > the same basic concepts in terms of memory and page storage. Really. Gosh, well, who would have thunk that a column oriented DataBlade would also use memory and pages? Certainly not me. > Yeah there's more to it and the distributed query management would be > different, but IDS would be the easiest database to implement these > concepts. Yeah, apart from those minor issues, huh? And one other minor issue: who wants this shit apart from you? > While you may see this as an abomination, others have been very > successful in implementing this. Yeah, it's taking over the RDBMS market. Oracle for one are absolutely shitting themselves. -- Cheers, Obnoxio The Clown http://obotheclown.blogspot.com I will now proceed to pleasure myself with this fish. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by OpenProtect(http://www.openprotect.com), and is believed to be clean.