Re: Negative PIDS, and SE/Online questions

In <1993Jan12.025433.3798@informix.com> aland@informix.com (Colonel Panic) writes: >In article <1993Jan11.220300.16666@informix.com> davek@informix.com (David Kosenko) writes: >>>My next question is about SE. I am very familiar with all the Informix >>>tools available to me when using Online. I am not familiar with SE. >> >>bcheck is the SE equiv of tbcheck, though it provides less (no equiv >Also CHECK TABLE within SQL, for any table that isn't already open otherwise. Which reminds me how irritating it is. Now that tbcheck exists there seems to be no reason why CHECK TABLE/REPAIR TABLE cannot be made common to both engines. Anybody know why this hasn't been done? Can we use this forum to get a Feature Request generated? -- graeme -- Disclaimer: The author's opinions are his own, and not necessarily those of Pyramid Technology Ltd. or Pyramid Technology Inc.