Re: Security options at different SQL-Databases with ODBC - who is best ?

Hi! Nils.Myklebust@idg.no (Nils Myklebust) wrote: >: Correct but this level of security should be handled by the database >: server. You can grant/revoke prvilieges to update/insert/delete/ >: select from each database table in turn for each user in turn. >This doesn't solve the problem at hand. Nils, it seems there are some very different levels of security in different types of organisations ;-) We are part of the government, and so I agree with you. I hope that my bank agrees, too ;-) >This does "solve" the problem, but limits you to do all updates this >way. Not very friendly and may create a lot of problems. This has been >discussed recently, and don't need too much repeating now. TANSTAAFL ;-) If you "need" a very easy-to-use develpopement tool like ODBC you will have to pay the money you save with your one hand with your other hand. Bis denne, Volker. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ich habe Londo das Leben gerettet, weil im All alles Leben heilig ist. Aber wenn derjenige, den man gerettet hat, diesen Glauben nicht mit einem teilt, hat man der Gegenwart gedient, indem man die Zukunft geopfert hat. (Lenier in Babylon 5) ----------------------------------------------------------------------