mehdi2@querix.com wrote:
> On 30 Jul 2003 at 10:42, Andrew Hamm wrote:
>
>> As for Querix, I don't know it, so sorry, I can't talk it up :-)
>
> Rather unfortunate , because you would have not had to do 90% the
> changes you write about when migrating to aother database.
Sorry, can't believe it. There are some things in Informix that DO NOT map
to the other databases.
↪ replying to Andrew Hamm
In article <bgd1i5$mouqe$1@ID-79573.news.uni-berlin.de>, ahamm@mail.com says...
> mehdi2@querix.com wrote:
> > On 30 Jul 2003 at 10:42, Andrew Hamm wrote:
> >
> >> As for Querix, I don't know it, so sorry, I can't talk it up :-)
> >
> > Rather unfortunate , because you would have not had to do 90% the
> > changes you write about when migrating to aother database.
>
> Sorry, can't believe it. There are some things in Informix that DO NOT map
> to the other databases.
He did say 90% - and in my experience, that is actually a bit conservative.
Same applies to 4Js and to a degree Aubit 4GL compilers. It also applies to IBM
Informix 4GL when using DB/2 as RDBMS.
--
Yours, Andrej Falout, http://www.falout.com/disclaimer.html
Visit the OpenSource alternative, Aubit 4gl: http://aubit4gl.sourceforge.net
PLEASE NOTE: All HTML email sent to me WILL BE DELETED AUTOMATICALLY WITHOUT
READING.