Re: IDS Feature Request List (including potential new requests).
On an IDS feature request list, David said IDS 10 already has the requested feature and suggested moving to 9.40.UC7; he had added n-tuple comparison as an SQL standard item. bozon asked which feature works in 10. Obnoxio The Clown joked 'all of them'. Jonathan Leffler guessed indexes on raw tables.
Auto-generated by Claude from the posts below — may be imperfect; read the full thread.
New features would go into IDS 10 that already has this feature and it works! If I was you I would try moving to 9.40.UC7 that should be a relatively simple upgrade. However I have added n-tuple comparison as it is part of the sql standard.
> New features would go into IDS 10 that already has this feature and it works! Which feature works in 10?
bozon said: > >> New features would go into IDS 10 that already has this feature and it > works! > > Which feature works in 10? All of them. Especially the "undocumented" ones. :o) -- Bye now, Obnoxio "C'est pas parce qu'on n'a rien ' dire qu'il faut fermer sa gueule" - Coluche did i mention i like nulls? heck, i even go so far as to say that all columns in a table except the primary key could/should be nullable. this has certain advantages, for example, if you need to insert a child record and you don't have a parent row for it, just do an insert into the parent table with the primary key value (everything else null), and voila, relational integrity is preserved. but this is, admittedly, a bit controversial among modellers. --r937, dbforums.com
bozon wrote: >>New features would go into IDS 10 that already has this feature and it >> works! > > Which feature works in 10? Probably indexes on raw tables. -- Jonathan Leffler #include <disclaimer.h> Email: jleffler@earthlink.net, jleffler@us.ibm.com Guardian of DBD::Informix v2005.02 -- http://dbi.perl.org/