RE: Oracle

Posted in 2005

Dirk Moolman — Thu, 3 Feb 2005 18:04:39 +0200 — source: Usenet: comp.databases.informix

Well, I only say "Informix" because this was said to me by the head of Informix Database Development (Kathryn Kennedy) at the end of last year :-) But IBM pays her salary yes ... ;-) -----Original Message----- From: Hamilton, Jerry [mailto:hamiltoj@fleishman.com] Sent: 03 February 2005 04:49 PM To: Dirk Moolman; Cesae Cruz; Sebastian, Norma J.; informix-list@iiug.org Subject: RE: Oracle You mean, IBM admits it's full of bugs. We're testing other versions now. It wasn't real fun being in a restore situation and finding out your backup tapes had bugs in them.... -----Original Message----- From: Dirk Moolman [mailto:DirkM@mxgroup.co.za] Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 8:20 AM To: Hamilton, Jerry; Cesae Cruz; Sebastian, Norma J.; informix-list@iiug.org Subject: RE: Oracle But then again - Informix also admits that 9.21 is full of bugs, and that people should migrate off that release asap. I wonder if the same issues are in other versions. ________________________________________ sending to informix-list