Translating with DrWatson… this can take a few seconds the first time.
This is a genuine, complex translation. DrWatson protects commands, error codes, and log output while naturally translating the surrounding text. It’s translated once and saved.
Massoroto asked how to back up several IDS 7.31 instances onto one tape, as the tape rewinds after each backup. Bozon suggested backing up to files and copying them to tape. Neil Truby said ontape to a no-rewind device works but restores need the archive copied with dd. Doug Lawry said it can be done by repositioning the tape with mt or tctl. Scottishpoet suggested one instance with multiple dbspace sets.
Auto-generated by Claude from the posts below — may be imperfect; read the full thread.
Hi.
I would like to knwo whether is it possible or not to backup more than
one instance in Informix IDS 7.31 on a single tape for later restore
all of them. I tried it but after each backup the tape is automatically
rewinded and so the other backup superposes the first one. The last one
is restored properly.
Thank you.
Alan
Do you have enough room on disk to back up to a file and then put that
file on tape? You could then backup the first database to a file then
put that on tape. You could then backup the second db to the same file
and then put then put that on the same tape using whatever file system
backup you use. We do this with ontape. I think that you can do it with
onbar also, but we don't use onbar here so I haven't used it in awhile.
↪ replying to Massoroto
Neil Truby — — source: Usenet: comp.databases.informix
>Massoroto" <alanmas@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:1128515357.105833.246540@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Hi.
>
> I would like to knwo whether is it possible or not to backup more than
> one instance in Informix IDS 7.31 on a single tape for later restore
> all of them. I tried it but after each backup the tape is automatically
> rewinded and so the other backup superposes the first one. The last one
> is restored properly.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Alan
>
I'm assuming ontape here.
Yes, you can. Do your backups to a no-rewind device. HOWEVER you can't
restore from a no-rewind device, so you will not be able to restore directly
from any archive but the first: in order to restore from the second archive
onwards you would first have to dd the archive to disk, or another tape.
--
Neil Truby t:01932 724027
Director m:07798 811708
Ardenta Limited e:neil.truby@ardenta.com
or you could replan you server so you have one instance but use
multiple dbspace sets to emulate each of the current instances
Then just backup the whole of the one instance.
At restore tiome you could just recover the dbspaces of the the "failed
"instance
Massoroto wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I would like to knwo whether is it possible or not to backup more than
> one instance in Informix IDS 7.31 on a single tape for later restore
> all of them. I tried it but after each backup the tape is automatically
> rewinded and so the other backup superposes the first one. The last one
> is restored properly.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Alan
Actually, you can, Neil. You need two sessions open, one to run ontape and the
other to enter commands to reposition the tape head at the beginning of the
second backup at each stage, e.g. "mt" on Linux and "tctl" on AIX. I have used
this on systems with only one tape drive where an Informix archive is appended
to a file system backup.
"Neil Truby" <neil.truby@ardenta.com> wrote:
> I'm assuming ontape here.
> Yes, you can. Do your backups to a no-rewind device. HOWEVER you can't
> restore from a no-rewind device, so you will not be able to restore directly
> from any archive but the first: in order to restore from the second archive
> onwards you would first have to dd the archive to disk, or another tape.
>
> Massoroto" <alanmas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I would like to know whether is it possible or not to backup more than
>> one instance in Informix IDS 7.31 on a single tape for later restore
>> all of them. I tried it but after each backup the tape is automatically
>> rewinded and so the other backup superposes the first one. The last one
>> is restored properly.
We use strictly necessary cookies to make this site work. With your
consent we’d also use optional cookies for analytics and marketing. You can accept all,
reject all, or choose. Read our Cookie Policy.