ok so blair was a "liberal progressive"

and new labour was a liberal front organisation people in america should consider what happened in the last ten years of blairism before they "progress" into support of obama and his "progressive liberalism" "change" he cries I am a socialist I scream "STOP" some technology is poisonous

On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 00:57:48 -0700 (PDT), alpy <ttrroonniicc@googlemail.com> said in <e3e400f4-243b-41c6-b05e-60c9a4bf1c26@l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com>: >and new labour was a liberal front organisation No it wasn't, it is a centre-right party in the Christian Democrat tradition, but since liberal is a swear-word among wingnut Septics I can see why anything to the left of Genghis Khan would be portrayed as liberal in order to undermine its credibility among the credulous. Although your drivel is unwelcome at most of the froups you've x-posted to, you will find a happy home at Conservapedia, the site run by wingnuts for wingnuts. Guy -- May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting. http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk 85% of helmet statistics are made up, 69% of them at CHS, Puget Sound