Oninit cdi / Archive
Talk to an expert →

RE: Problems with tempdbs with IDS 9.30 UC1 and RedHat 7.1

Posted in 2006

Topics: Installation, Setup & Upgrades, Storage & Space Management, Versions, Editions & End-of-Life

Simmons, Keith — — source: Usenet: comp.databases.informix

Andreas Upgrade to 10.00 (or 9.4 at a pinch) UPDATE STATISTICS Keith -> -----Original Message----- -> From: Andreas [mailto:a.weidner@knauer-verpackung.de] -> Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 10:34 AM -> To: informix-list@iiug.org -> Subject: Problems with tempdbs with IDS 9.30 UC1 and RedHat 7.1 -> -> -> Hallo, -> -> we have problems with a new installed IDS 9.30 UC1 on a RedHat 7.1 -> system. -> -> If we do a query on our databases, we get more than 400.000 pages -> written and near the same number of pages readed from the tempdbs -> partition. All other page written on partitions with rootdbs and -> datadbs seem to be normal. -> -> We are using a HP DL 380 G4 with 2 CPUs and 3.6 GB of memory. The -> RedHat runs on a virtual machine (VMware 2.5.3). A HP MSA1000 is used -> as disk. -> -> What could we do? -> -> Best regards -> Andreas -> -> _______________________________________________ -> Informix-list mailing list -> Informix-list@iiug.org -> http://www.iiug.org/mailman/listinfo/informix-list -> *********************************************************************************************** This message is sent in strict confidence for the addressee only. It may contain legally privileged information. The contents are not to be disclosed to anyone other than the addressee. Unauthorised recipients are requested to preserve this confidentiality and to advise the sender immediately of any error in transmission. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses, however we cannot guarantee that this message is free from such problems. ***********************************************************************************************

↪ replying to Simmons, Keith
Andreas — — source: Usenet: comp.databases.informix

Hallo Keith, we have only this version because the support contract was cancled. So we had to use IDS 9.30 UC1. We have the same software on an older system with 1 GB memory running. Perfect! In 14 days there are only 420.000 pages written to the tempdbs. With the new server this is the amount of 1 action. Onconfig was copied from the old machine, so the IDS configuration should be identically. Any other suggestions? Simmons, Keith schrieb: > Andreas > > Upgrade to 10.00 (or 9.4 at a pinch) > UPDATE STATISTICS> > Keith > > -> -----Original Message----- > -> From: Andreas [mailto:a.weidner@knauer-verpackung.de] > -> Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 10:34 AM > -> To: informix-list@iiug.org > -> Subject: Problems with tempdbs with IDS 9.30 UC1 and RedHat 7.1 > -> > -> > -> Hallo, > -> > -> we have problems with a new installed IDS 9.30 UC1 on a RedHat 7.1 > -> system. > -> > -> If we do a query on our databases, we get more than 400.000 pages > -> written and near the same number of pages readed from the tempdbs > -> partition. All other page written on partitions with rootdbs and > -> datadbs seem to be normal. > -> > -> We are using a HP DL 380 G4 with 2 CPUs and 3.6 GB of memory. The > -> RedHat runs on a virtual machine (VMware 2.5.3). A HP MSA1000 is used > -> as disk. > -> > -> What could we do? > -> > -> Best regards > -> Andreas > -> > -> _______________________________________________ > -> Informix-list mailing list > -> Informix-list@iiug.org > -> http://www.iiug.org/mailman/listinfo/informix-list > -> > > *********************************************************************************************** > This message is sent in strict confidence for the addressee only. It may contain legally privileged information. The contents are not to be disclosed to anyone other than the addressee. Unauthorised recipients are requested to preserve this confidentiality and to advise the sender immediately of any error in transmission. > > This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses, however we cannot guarantee that this message is free from such problems. > ***********************************************************************************************

↪ replying to Simmons, Keith
Andreas — — source: Usenet: comp.databases.informix

Hallo Keith, we have only this version because the support contract was cancled. So we had to use IDS 9.30 UC1. We have the same software on an older system with 1 GB memory running. Perfect! In 14 days there are only 420.000 pages written to the tempdbs. With the new server this is the amount of 1 action. Onconfig was copied from the old machine, so the IDS configuration should be identically. Any other suggestions? Simmons, Keith schrieb: > Andreas > > Upgrade to 10.00 (or 9.4 at a pinch) > UPDATE STATISTICS> > Keith > > -> -----Original Message----- > -> From: Andreas [mailto:a.weidner@knauer-verpackung.de] > -> Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 10:34 AM > -> To: informix-list@iiug.org > -> Subject: Problems with tempdbs with IDS 9.30 UC1 and RedHat 7.1 > -> > -> > -> Hallo, > -> > -> we have problems with a new installed IDS 9.30 UC1 on a RedHat 7.1 > -> system. > -> > -> If we do a query on our databases, we get more than 400.000 pages > -> written and near the same number of pages readed from the tempdbs > -> partition. All other page written on partitions with rootdbs and > -> datadbs seem to be normal. > -> > -> We are using a HP DL 380 G4 with 2 CPUs and 3.6 GB of memory. The > -> RedHat runs on a virtual machine (VMware 2.5.3). A HP MSA1000 is used > -> as disk. > -> > -> What could we do? > -> > -> Best regards > -> Andreas > -> > -> _______________________________________________ > -> Informix-list mailing list > -> Informix-list@iiug.org > -> http://www.iiug.org/mailman/listinfo/informix-list > -> > > *********************************************************************************************** > This message is sent in strict confidence for the addressee only. It may contain legally privileged information. The contents are not to be disclosed to anyone other than the addressee. Unauthorised recipients are requested to preserve this confidentiality and to advise the sender immediately of any error in transmission. > > This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses, however we cannot guarantee that this message is free from such problems. > ***********************************************************************************************

Glossary