Re: Opinions Wanted: ON-ARCHIVE vs old-fashioned ontape
Bill -
On-Archive is going to be replaced in an upcoming release (I think either
7.2 or 8.0). On-Archive is a bit cumbersome to setup and use, so if you
really do not need the features it provides, I would strongly recommend
holding off.
Jon
At 01:52 PM 8/14/95 -0400, Bill Kules wrote:
>
>Is anyone aware of compelling reasons to use ON-ARCHIVE
>instead of ontape?
>
>It's got lots of nice features, but we don't need them,
>so I'm inclined to stick with ontape, since I can wrap
>it in a shell script and hide it from the operator.
>
>Thanks in advance,
>Bill
>------------------------
>Bill Kules wmk@radyn.com
>Radio Dynamics Corporation (301) 891-1036 (voice)
>13147 Hutchinson Way (301) 891-2984 (fax)
>Silver Spring, MD 20906
>
>
====================================================
Jon Vemo Internet: jvemo@cyberspace.com
Bothell, WA USA
Watch out for road-kill on the information superhighway....SPLAT!!
====================================================