Re: Monitoring lock tables

Leonid Vorontsov wrote: > June Tong wrote: > ... > > lk_type: type of lock > ... > > I didn't bother figuring out what the numeric lock_type means, but surely > > that should be easy. > > Sorry. Explain please. What I meant was, that I presumed that, given the SQL statement, and the output of an onstat -k, anyone could figure out the mappings between the numeric value of the lock type and the onstat -k representation of the lock type. Of course, I could be wrong. June -- june_t@hotmail.com Lost in the wilds of Palo Alto, living on Oreo's