Translating with DrWatson… this can take a few seconds the first time.
This is a genuine, complex translation. DrWatson protects commands, error codes, and log output while naturally translating the surrounding text. It’s translated once and saved.
Hello,
i have a strange behaviour, maybe somebody can help.
Short:
Windows Server 2008R2 x64bit with 2 Informix installations.
Installation are "default" no changes on parameter.
One Installation Informix 11.7, the other 12.10.
Created "demonstration database" for 11.7 and 12.10 server instance.
For the 11.7 the installed OAT shows good storage wait times.
For the 12.10 the installed OAT shows BAD storage wait times.
Background: in production system database on our 11.7 seems to have better
performance than on new 12.10 server.
Also on production server we can see the difference in OAT.
So we installed a test system.
At the moment we can not find the problem.
For the test system both informix installations are running on same server,
configuration is default from installation, same filesystem, database files on
same harddisk.
On a linux system (also installed default) with informix 12.10 the OAT shows
good waittimes.
Maybe somebody have seen similar behaviuor on other systems?
We have talked with our people running informix 12.X on windows server, they
have good performance and wait times.
Regards
Marc
Hello,
additional tests:
Windows 2016 server with informix 12 and informix 14.
Good performance values in OAT for informix 14, same bad values for informix
12.
onstat -g iof shows for io/s values between 4 - 6 for informix 12.10.
onstat -g iof shows for io/s values between 2000 -4000 for informix 14
kaio reads / writes also big difference
12.10 = 0.2xxx
14 = 0.0003
i am testing 12.10.FC12DE
and 14.10.FC1DE
Maybe the values are only wrong (factor 1.000)?
Anybody similar values?
We use strictly necessary cookies to make this site work. With your
consent we’d also use optional cookies for analytics and marketing. You can accept all,
reject all, or choose. Read our Cookie Policy.