On 21 Nov 96 at 11:15, Systems Team wrote:
> I would advise against using rowid for identifying rows. It is an "internal" field, with no
> specific meaning to the (logical) record concerned. Thus its value is not preserved if the
> table is re-organized in any way. Also, I thought that Informix were removing/have
> removed(?) support for rowid in later versions of OnLine - True or False?
It's not being removed, it's just not guaranteed to be unique if you
use table fragmentation.
--
Ciao,
Billy
I'd be in favour of apathy, but I just couldn't be bothered...