Re: Interesting

Not sure if Fernando's note went to the group or just to me. In the case of a system which was upgraded to 11.50 (as opposed to a fresh install) we might expect to see the behaviour I indicated previously. Good of you to point out that a fresh install of 11.50 behaves as does 11.70 IMHO both behaviors are incorrect. j. On Oct 4, 2012, at 11:48 AM, FRANK wrote: > In our IDS11.50 FC8, it shows, > > alter table abc_test add { kk int};> # ^ > # 8200: User (informix) does not have DBSECADM authority. > # > > Frank > > On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Jack Parker <jack.parker4@verizon.net> wrote: > > A newbie-ish fellow here just wrote me to say that on 11.5: > > alter table <table> > add > { > col4 char(10) > }; > > Says "Table altered", but did not add his column. > > Since curly brackets are comments - of course it didn't, but I'm surprised that he got a success message. When I try it on my (11.7) machine I get: > > 8200: User (informix) does not have DBSECADM authority.> > Which is also a surprise. > > j. > _______________________________________________ > Informix-list mailing list > Informix-list@iiug.org > http://www.iiug.org/mailman/listinfo/informix-list >