Re: Informix NT vs Unix

Paul Watson wrote: > > Billy Wheeler wrote: > > > > On 10 Mar 98 at 17:48, Robert Read wrote: > > > > > One more thing-if you go with Unix, see if Solaris x86 is available. > > > Although I've never used Solaris on intel, I've used SCO and and I'd > > > rather use Solaris. SCO will get the job done, though. > > > > I've tried both. Solaris might be a better OS on SPARC, but it runs > > like a dog on Intel. Hell, it's worse than NT .... :-) > > Good God something worse than NT:-)) > > I don't think the question should be performance more one of stability. > IMHO Unix is totally stable when compared to NT and that is a good > enough reason to chose it. > > -- > Paul Watson # > WF Software Ltd # It said run using Windows 95 > Tel: +44 1436 674629 # or better in the manual > Fax: +44 1436 678693 # so I used Unix > www.wfsoftware.co.uk # Yes - see Jon Udell in latest Byte magazine - their Unix web servers never crash but NT does. -- Peter Lancashire Information Systems Specialist, Bayer plc Eastern Way, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, IP32 7AH, UK Tel: +44-1635-562258, Fax: +44-1635-562281 Mail: Peter.Lancashire.PL1@bayer.co.uk My Internet plumbing does not allow me to mail and post news together. Sorry. All opinions are my own and not those of Bayer plc.