Re: Isolation levels in Informix vs Oracle

rkusenet said: > > "DA Morgan" <damorgan@x.washington.edu> wrote in message > news:41d31d31$1_4@127.0.0.1... >> Obnoxio The Chav wrote: >> >> >>Does Informix >> >>have the concept of a save point (named point within a transaction you >> >>can later rollback to if required) ? >> > >> > >> > Red herring. >> >> Why so? It is part of the ANSI standard is it not? > > since when commitment to ANSI standard a point to debate. AFAIK Oracle > does not provide all ANSI standard READ_UNCOMMITTED, READ_COMMITTED, > REPEATABLE_READ, SERIALIZABLE isolation level. You won't hold that > against Oracle,right :-) Apart from that, it had nothing to do with the original point. Save points are not needed for transactions. :o) -- Bye now, Obnoxio "C'est pas parce qu'on n'a rien ' dire qu'il faut fermer sa gueule" - Coluche "I'm trying to see things your way, but I can't get my head up my ass" - JCH "Ogni uomo mi guarda come se fossi una testa di cazzo" - Marco I went to the airport to check in and they asked what I did because I looked like a terrorist. I said I was a comedian. They said, "Say something funny then." I told them I had just graduated from flying school. -- Ahmed Ahmed sending to informix-list