Re: C-ISAM: should we use it?

Posted in 1991

Walt Hultgren {rmy} — Tue, 24 Sep 91 14:47:35 -0400 — source: Informix-list mailing list archive (1991-1998)

Path: emory!att!linac!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!shearson.com!press!fsmadja From: fsmadja@figment.shearson.com (Frank Smadja) Newsgroups: comp.databases.informix Message-ID: <FSMADJA.91Sep23121136@figment.shearson.com> Date: 23 Sep 91 16:11:36 GMT References: <1991Sep23.042632.4884@redsox.bsw.com> Sender: news@shearson.com Reply-To: fsmadja@alfred.shearson.com Organization: Lehman Brothers In-Reply-To: campbell@redsox.bsw.com's message of Mon, 23 Sep 1991 04:26:32 GM I am a C-ISAM user and I am pretty happy with it. The only disapointment is speed but this not might proper to C-ISAM. To answer your querstions: C-ISAM has all the functionality you need plus much more. C-ISAM is rock solid so far. C-ISAM source is not available. C-ISAM Documentation is good. Frank