Re: Bug 83048

Posted in 1998

Peter Lancashire — Fri, 29 May 1998 12:33:39 +0100 — source: Informix-list mailing list archive (1991-1998)

David Williams wrote: > > In article <6k2b85$3jl@bgtnsc02.worldnet.att.net>, Idiot > <rajam@worldnet.att.net> writes > >If anybody interested...... > > > >Last weekend we have upgraded 2 of our 9 production server from 7.23UC5 to > >7.23UC11X1 mainly because some of the bug fixes that we needed. Since then > >we had experienced huge performance degradation. > > > Isn't X1 a quick and dirty patch release which has probably not been > fully QA'ed? > <snip> Yes, the X indicates a patch. I had one which had definitely not been QAed - it introduced a more serious bug than the one the patch was supposed to fix... -- Peter Lancashire Information Systems Specialist, Bayer plc Eastern Way, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, IP32 7AH, UK Tel: +44-1635-562258, Fax: +44-1635-562281 Mail: Peter.Lancashire.PL1@bayer.co.uk --- My Internet plumbing does not allow me to mail and post news together. Sorry. All opinions are my own and not those of Bayer plc. --- Join Infuse, the UK Informix User Group at http://www.infuse.org.uk/