Upgrading to version 10 ontape question
bozon asked whether ontape in version 10 can read version 9.21 archives, since restoring production copies to test required downgrading the test server. Obnoxio The Clown said it would be unsupported anyway and suggested dbexport or dbcopy. Neil Truby said no and mentioned an xC4 bug. Tilman Model-Bosch recalled it was a feature request delayed to a later version. Not possible.
Auto-generated by Claude from the posts below — may be imperfect; read the full thread.
Is there a way to have version 10 of ontape read version 9.21 archives?
The Configuration Management (CM) people tried put failed. I just
assumed you couldn't do it so I never tried. The problem is that
production is 9.21 but we are testing 10 getting ready for the glorious
day that we upgrade to 10.0 UC4. So now inorder to restore a production
copy to our test system we have to down grade a test server restore the
9.21 and then re-upgrade the server. It would be OK if we didn't have 3
instances per test server running that had to be off line while we were
restoring the production servers which took 4 - 6 hours.
bozon said:
> Is there a way to have version 10 of ontape read version 9.21 archives?
> The Configuration Management (CM) people tried put failed. I just
> assumed you couldn't do it so I never tried. The problem is that
> production is 9.21 but we are testing 10 getting ready for the glorious
> day that we upgrade to 10.0 UC4. So now inorder to restore a production
> copy to our test system we have to down grade a test server restore the
> 9.21 and then re-upgrade the server. It would be OK if we didn't have 3
> instances per test server running that had to be off line while we were
> restoring the production servers which took 4 - 6 hours.
I suspect that even if this did work, it would be entirely unsupported.
Why not try dbexport or dbcopy or something?
--
Bye now,
Obnoxio
Information within this post contains forward looking statements within
the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21B
of the S E C Act of 1934. Statements that involve discussions with respect
to projections of future events are not statements of historical fact and
may be forward looking statements. Don't rely on them to make a decision.
The poster is not a reporting company registered under the Exchange Act of
1934.
I have received a life peerage from Her Majesty, who is not an officer,
minister or affiliate Labour party member.
I intend to recover my loan now, which could cause the parliamentary
majority to go down, resulting in losses for you. Today's Labour party
has: an accumulated deficit and a reliance on loans from officers and
affiliates to pay expenses. It is not an operating political party. The
party is going to need financing to continue as a going concern. A failure
to finance could cause the party to go out of business. This report shall
not be construed as any kind of investment advice or solicitation. You can
lose all your money by investing in this party.
"bozon" <curtis@crowson1.com> wrote in message
news:1148478769.263869.118160@j73g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Is there a way to have version 10 of ontape read version 9.21 archives?
Of course not.
> The Configuration Management (CM) people tried put failed. I just
> assumed you couldn't do it so I never tried. The problem is that
> production is 9.21 but we are testing 10 getting ready for the glorious
> day that we upgrade to 10.0 UC4.
This bug in xC4 seems to be biting a lot of people:
Bug: 175708 -874 AND AF WHEN EXECUTING TWICE A STORED PROCEDURE
Bozon wrote
>Is there a way to have version 10 of ontape read version 9.21 archives?
If I recall it correctly this was a feature request , but I think it has
been delayed for
IDS Vnext :-/
Regards
Tilman
Related threads
- Re: CPU usage problems when using KAIO in V7.3? on SINIX.
- buffer usage
- IDS 7.31 connect Cold Fusion Server 4.5
- 874: General exception error has occurred in the optimizer.
- Log restore failing