Translating with DrWatson… this can take a few seconds the first time.
This is a genuine, complex translation. DrWatson protects commands, error codes, and log output while naturally translating the surrounding text. It’s translated once and saved.
scottishpoet asked what difference it makes if the IDS trial download is UC3 or UC4. Neil Truby cited a bug (173090, a server crash in 2-node replication). Another poster felt trials should match current releases. Obnoxio The Clown and scottishpoet thought trials running a fixpack or two behind GA were acceptable. No definite answer.
Auto-generated by Claude from the posts below — may be imperfect; read the full thread.
what difference does it make if the trial version is UC3 or UC4?
↪ replying to scottishpoet
Neil Truby — — source: Usenet: comp.databases.informix
"scottishpoet" <dryburghj@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1135767058.590179.72090@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> what difference does it make if the trial version is UC3 or UC4?
>
Bug: 173090 SERVER CRASH WITH "ASSERT FAILED: YIELD_PROCESSOR: CONDITIONAL
LATCH COUNT NON-ZERO IN THREAD 7" AT 2ND NODE IN A 2-NODE REPLICATION
SCENARIO perhaps?
Well the trail releases should be sync'ed with the actual releases.
I thought IBM were at least that professional.
Who would want to trial something that is one fixpack behind the latest
version?
david@smooth1.co.uk said:
>
>
> Well the trail releases should be sync'ed with the actual releases.
>
> I thought IBM were at least that professional.
>
> Who would want to trial something that is one fixpack behind the latest
> version?
I don't think most people take trials quite that seriously.
--
Bye now,
Obnoxio
"C'est pas parce qu'on n'a rien ' dire qu'il faut fermer sa gueule"
- Coluche
did i mention i like nulls? heck, i even go so far as to say that all
columns in a table except the primary key could/should be nullable. this
has certain advantages, for example, if you need to insert a child record
and you don't have a parent row for it, just do an insert into the parent
table with the primary key value (everything else null), and voila,
relational integrity is preserved. but this is, admittedly, a bit
controversial among modellers.
--r937, dbforums.com
This is a trial version which is timebombed for something like 30 days.
Would someone who has enough knowledge of the product to stumble across
this bug really needs the eval version.
Personally I like the idea that the trial version is 1 or 2 fix packs
behind the GA product.
We use strictly necessary cookies to make this site work. With your
consent we’d also use optional cookies for analytics and marketing. You can accept all,
reject all, or choose. Read our Cookie Policy.