Re: Testing 123...

Ian Michael Gumby wrote: > Art, > > That's the kicker. > So far only you see this thread. > Nobody else. So I guess they still haven't solved the problem yet..... Yeah looks that way. > Oh and see below: Moi aussi. > "Art S. Kagel" <kagel@bloomberg.net> wrote in message > news:44c5498b$0$23565$afc38c87@... > >>Ian Michael Gumby wrote: >> >>>Anyone who isn't using Verizon/MCI/UUNET able to see this post? >> >>I'm on Usenet, but I see you buddy. >> >> >>>Sorry but Verizon now claims to have solved the problem, so Can anyone >>>who sees this post please respond? >> >>Yeah, they say they solved mine finally too (after 4 years of complaints). >>Would you believe one of their servers had a corrupt RAID5 drive set that >>was returning flaky data and was unrecoverable so it had to be rebuilt >>from one of the other mirror machines? >><HUGE GRIN> >> > So that's what they are telling me. > Funny thing. It has little to do with the propagation of news... Yeah, don't know what it had to do with rejecting my postings as being 'too small' either. Art S. Kagel >>NO RAID5!!! >> >> >>>Sorry for the trash, but hey! >>>What else am I supposed to do? >> >>Art S. Kagel > > >