Translating with DrWatson… this can take a few seconds the first time.
This is a genuine, complex translation. DrWatson protects commands, error codes, and log output while naturally translating the surrounding text. It’s translated once and saved.
Markus Bschorer asked whether KAIO on Linux 2.6 really gives big performance gains, since a beta tester of IDS 9.4 UC5 saw none. Ben Thompson said his 9.40.UC5 on SuSE 9.2 had no KAIO, suspected 9.50 was meant, and said KAIO is a definite improvement on AIX. Markus questioned whether a modest gain justified changing platforms. No firm answer.
Auto-generated by Claude from the posts below — may be imperfect; read the full thread.
Hi all,
on some websites, you can read wonderful things concerning KAIO, like
dramatically better performance in high-traffic-scenarios.
Linux Kernel 2.6 supports KAIO. I talked to a Beta-Tester of IDS Version 9.4
UC5, which supports KAIO under Linux 2.6. He told me, that there is no
appreciable performance-benefit when using KAIO.
Does anyone know, whether that's because of a bad informix-implenattaion of
KAIO, or a of bad linux-implementation of KAIO?
Is KAIO really such a magic bullet?
Thanks in advance!
Bye Markus
↪ replying to Markus Bschorer
Ben Thompson — — source: Usenet: comp.databases.informix
Markus Bschorer wrote:
> on some websites, you can read wonderful things concerning KAIO, like
> dramatically better performance in high-traffic-scenarios.
> Linux Kernel 2.6 supports KAIO. I talked to a Beta-Tester of IDS Version 9.4
> UC5, which supports KAIO under Linux 2.6. He told me, that there is no
> appreciable performance-benefit when using KAIO.
Are you sure this is the case? I have 9.40.UC5 running on SuSE 9.2
(kernel 2.6.8) and there's no KAIO. Maybe there's a hidden parameter to
turn it on. Are you sure your beta tester isn't using 9.50?
> Does anyone know, whether that's because of a bad informix-implenattaion of
> KAIO, or a of bad linux-implementation of KAIO?
> Is KAIO really such a magic bullet?
KAIO works well on AIX and is a definite improvement over not using KAIO.
Ben.
Hi Ben,
ok, may be its Version 9.5, because the Beta-Tester told me, that it's not
currently released and that it will be released in the first quarter of
2005.
What do you mean by "definite improvement" ? An improvement of 5% is not
reason enough (for me) to switch from linux to aix- or solaris-based
hardware. We currently work on a 2xXeon-Dell-Server (Linux 2.4) and consider
to change to solaris9 on a 4xSparc64-Machine.
Thanks!
Markus
"Ben Thompson" <ben@nomonitorsoftspam.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:10uvim5qdk3c5cf@corp.supernews.com...
> Markus Bschorer wrote:
>
> > on some websites, you can read wonderful things concerning KAIO, like
> > dramatically better performance in high-traffic-scenarios.
> > Linux Kernel 2.6 supports KAIO. I talked to a Beta-Tester of IDS Version
9.4
> > UC5, which supports KAIO under Linux 2.6. He told me, that there is no
> > appreciable performance-benefit when using KAIO.
>
> Are you sure this is the case? I have 9.40.UC5 running on SuSE 9.2
> (kernel 2.6.8) and there's no KAIO. Maybe there's a hidden parameter to
> turn it on. Are you sure your beta tester isn't using 9.50?
>
> > Does anyone know, whether that's because of a bad informix-implenattaion
of
> > KAIO, or a of bad linux-implementation of KAIO?
> > Is KAIO really such a magic bullet?
>
> KAIO works well on AIX and is a definite improvement over not using KAIO.
>
> Ben.
"Markus Bschorer" <mb@worxbox.com> wrote in message
news:csoj2v$mu0$05$1@news.t-online.com...
> Hi Ben,
>
> ok, may be its Version 9.5,
What's that then?
We use strictly necessary cookies to make this site work. With your
consent we’d also use optional cookies for analytics and marketing. You can accept all,
reject all, or choose. Read our Cookie Policy.