Re: split informix

Posted in 1998

Michael Segel — Thu, 05 Mar 1998 08:34:14 -0600 — source: Informix-list mailing list archive (1991-1998)

Randall Young wrote: > Perhaps, Informix should split itself at least internally. We could have > Informix_RealWorld that continues to support us horible wretches that have > used Informix products for the last 15 years or so. This product continues > to provide solutions for us and we are able to use the product in > [SNIP] There's no need, if only Informix would listen.(Oh yeah, I forgot that the IIUG has this wonderful advocacy program that's paid for by Informix.) > money. Is that tacky enough? I guess I should apoligize to all of you > people in cdi. No I shouldn't. You folks should rear up on your hind legs > and demand something better. A stockholders revolt? Yee! > > Randall Young > ryoung@bix.com Hey, some of us are shareholders too. Some of us are considering going to the shareholder's meeting (May 21, 1998 at the Menlo Park HQ). Revolt? Naw, no cobblestones to create a barricade, and then you have to deal with all the blood and guts. Haz Mat would have a field day with us as too the STPCC. (Society to Prevent the Cruelty to CEOs ) [Its a joke so lighten up Francis]