Re: Year 2000 is NOT a leap year

Posted in 1997

The Dad — 22 Jul 1997 20:32:26 -0400 — source: Informix-list mailing list archive (1991-1998)

I thought that the next term was 4000 (from something I read back when I thought that this was interesting... it's been a while). Someone then proceeded to correct me that this was an old wives' tail. I didn't know for sure, so I shut up. Could this term be far enough out (I mean, I surely won't see it,... but I'm trying :-) that it might drift as the earth slows down? Later, -- Scott Lee scottlee@mindspring.com