Translating with DrWatson… this can take a few seconds the first time.
This is a genuine, complex translation. DrWatson protects commands, error codes, and log output while naturally translating the surrounding text. It’s translated once and saved.
Gurpreet Sachdeva asked about Enterprise Replication: overlapping replicate sets across nodes, scalability, IPv6, licensing. Madison Pruet said yes to differing replicate sets, said blobs are not costly to replicate, and that network encryption exists but he would not say FIPS relates to ER. Gurpreet then asked about JITC compliance; no answer given.
Auto-generated by Claude from the posts below — may be imperfect; read the full thread.
I plan to use Enterprise Replication for replicating information amongst
multiple IDS instances. Regarding this I had few queries:
a) Can there be two different sets of replicates configured between different
nodes. For e.g. consider the below scenario:
i) Replicate 1 - Nodes A and B replicate table X information amongst themselves
ii) Replicate 2 - Nodes A, B and C replicate table Y information amongst
themselves
b) Whats the level of scalability offered by ER in terms of the number of
nodes which can be inter-connected in Update - Anywhere topology. Also, whats
the scalability offered in terms of number of bytes which can be transferred.
c) Is ER IPv6 compliant. I mean the interface on which replication takes
place, can that be IPv6 interface.
d) What are the licensing terms for ER. Do I need a separate license for ER if
I already have license for normal IDS
↪ replying to GURPREET SACHDEVA
Madison Pruet — — source: IIUG Forums & Mailing Lists
See below....
=
From: "GURPREET SACHDEVA" <gusachde@cisco.com> =
=
To: ids@iiug.org =
=
Date: 01/17/2012 10:36 AM =
=
Subject: Enterprise Replication [25952] =
=
Sent by: ids-bounces@iiug.org =
=
I plan to use Enterprise Replication for replicating information amongs=
t
multiple IDS instances. Regarding this I had few queries:
a) Can there be two different sets of replicates configured between
different
nodes. For e.g. consider the below scenario:
i) Replicate 1 - Nodes A and B replicate table X information amongst
themselves
ii) Replicate 2 - Nodes A, B and C replicate table Y information amongs=
t
themselves
MP said Yes
b) Whats the level of scalability offered by ER in terms of the number =
of
nodes which can be inter-connected in Update - Anywhere topology. Also,=
whats
the scalability offered in terms of number of bytes which can be
transferred.
MP said "We have customers with up to 150 nodes"
c) Is ER IPv6 compliant. I mean the interface on which replication take=
s
place, can that be IPv6 interface.
MP said
ER is IPv4 and IPv6 agnostic. ER uses the standard server communicatio=
n
layer to communicate.
d) What are the licensing terms for ER. Do I need a separate license fo=
r ER
if
I already have license for normal IDS
MP said
No special licensing if you have the enterprise edition.
***********************************************************************=
********
Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion forum.
=
How costly is it to replicate blobs.
Is ER FIPS compliant
↪ replying to GURPREET SACHDEVA
Madison Pruet — — source: IIUG Forums & Mailing Lists
It is not costly to replicate blobs with ER.
There is support for network encryption, but I wouldn't say that 100% of
FIPS is even related to ER.
From: "GURPREET SACHDEVA" <gusachde@cisco.com>
To: ids@iiug.org
Date: 01/18/2012 06:38 AM
Subject: Re: Enterprise Replication [25967]
Sent by: ids-bounces@iiug.org
How costly is it to replicate blobs.
Is ER FIPS compliant
*******************************************************************************
Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion forum.
We use strictly necessary cookies to make this site work. With your
consent we’d also use optional cookies for analytics and marketing. You can accept all,
reject all, or choose. Read our Cookie Policy.