Re: oops

Posted in 2005

Cartlon Shew — Thu, 24 Feb 2005 10:08:15 -0700 — source: Usenet: comp.databases.informix

On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 05:32:28 GMT, "June C. Hunt" <june_c_hunt@hotmail.com> wrote: >Looking back, I'm also curious about this since the first of my >paragraphs refers to the general female response to "the word" and the >second paragraph refers to understanding and use of "the word". You >clipped the second paragraph and replaced it with "[ETC ETC ETC]". I >specifically softened the "indignant" response in that second paragraph >by noting that anyone dumb enough to use that word in the presence of a >woman should ensure his own safety by making sure that he is out of >striking range. Do you have a problem with that piece of advice? I do since it seems to be condoning violence.