Re: No future for DB2

"Noons" <wizofoz2k@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message news:42f11672$0$11922$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au... > Madison Pruet apparently said,on my timestamp of 4/08/2005 1:00 AM: > > >> > >>If you have SUCH A BIG problem with cross-posting, HOW COME > >>it's only now you're piping about it? Hmmmm? > > > > > > Because you stated "that is not possible with ANY replication in any > > database version." in comp.databases.informix, which is simply not true. > > That is absolute BULLSHIT. I asked: why did you not complain > about x-posting before! Nothing to do with replication. > Not even remotely related. Noons - you posted misinformation in comp.database.ibm_db2, comp.databases.informix, and comp.databases.oracle.server. You stated in those news groups ... well we all know know what you stated. Since you passed misinformation in those news groups, then it only stands to reason that the correction also belongs in those news groups. By the way - since it appears that you have rather limited knowledge about replication solutions, Sybase replication works by replication the procedural calls made on the source. Therefor, Sybase replication is totally in line with what I was talking about.

Madison Pruet apparently said,on my timestamp of 4/08/2005 5:23 AM: > > By the way - since it appears that you have rather limited knowledge about > replication solutions, Sybase replication works by replication the > procedural calls made on the source. Therefor, Sybase replication is > totally in line with what I was talking about. Yes, yes. Sure... Does the expression "couldn't care less" register? -- Nuno Souto in sunny Sydney, Australia wizofoz2k@yahoo.com.au.nospam