Re: PDQ

Posted in 2003

Mark D. Stock — Thu, 23 Oct 2003 18:04:36 +0100 — source: Usenet: comp.databases.informix

Rajib Sarkar wrote: > > Actually, Obnoxio is kind of right ..:-) Although this parameter is not > new, this parameter has been "upgraded" to accomodate a) More memory for > sorting b) To print out the progress of update stats (explain plan). It's lucky I added the proviso, "Unless they've changed it." then. :-) > (See attached file: UpdateStatisticsHeadsupArticle.doc) Ooh, and it actually came through. I bet a lot of news readers are choking and thanking you for that. :-| Anyway, thanks for the update. In what version was this parameter "upgraded"? Cheers, -- Mark. +----------------------------------------------------------+-----------+ | Mark D. Stock mailto:mdstock@MydasSolutions.com |//////// /| | Mydas Solutions Ltd http://MydasSolutions.com |///// / //| | +-----------------------------------+//// / ///| | |We value your comments, which have |/// / ////| | |been recorded and automatically |// / /////| | |emailed back to us for our records.|/ ////////| +----------------------+-----------------------------------+-----------+ sending to informix-list