Re: WARNING: mt_aio_wait: errno == EINVAL
Posted in 2005
Hello, this information is incorrect. Actually the problem is caused (not fixed) by Solaris patch 108993-27 or higher, which you usally install with the latest patch cluster provided by Sun. This problem was fixed in IDS 9.40.xC5. This (misleading) error message is cosmetic, except for raising it in your alarm program ... You can also contact Technical Support regarding B#166583. Regards -- Steffen. Tsutomu Ogiwara wrote: > Hi. > > Apply patch 108993(108993-27 or higher) under Solaris. > You will sovle "WARNING: mt_aio_wait: errno == EINVAL". > > Regards. > -- > Tsutomu Ogiwara from Tokyo Japan. > ICQ#:168106592 > > > > >> From: try_and_err@web.de (try_and_err) >> Reply-To: try_and_err@web.de (try_and_err) >> To: informix-list@iiug.org >> Subject: WARNING: mt_aio_wait: errno == EINVAL >> Date: 21 Mar 2005 12:06:07 -0800 >> >> Hello, >> >> another question: >> From time to time i receive the following info from my alarmprogram: >> EVENT_SEVERITY: 3 >> EVENT_CLASS : 6 >> EVENT_MSG : Internal Subsystem failure: 'AIO' >> EVENT_ADD_TEXT: WARNING: mt_aio_wait: errno == EINVAL >> EVENT_FILE : >> >> Oh, i think 'bad thing', but when i look in the online.log: >> - WARNING: mt_aio_wait: errno == EINVAL >> - listener-thread: err = -951: oserr = 2: errstr = testx: Incorrect >> password or user testx is not known on the database server. System >> error = 2. >> >> It seems, that this only arises when the user is really unknown. For >> example, when the user is known but the password is false (no >> alarmprogram notification): >> - Password Validation for user [test] failed! >> - Check for password aging/account lock-out. >> - listener-thread: err = -952: oserr = 0: errstr = test: User (test)'s >> password is not correct for the database server. >> >> We use NIS for the user identification, is this a NIS or a generally >> Informix problem ? Possibly someone knows a solution ? >> We use 9.30.UC5 on Solaris 8. >> >> Regards, >> try_and_err > > > > sending to informix-list > > > sending to informix-list