Fw: Company thought DB2 will be better than Oracle.

Posted in 2003

Mark Denham — Sun, 14 Sep 2003 11:04:58 -0400 — source: Usenet: comp.databases.informix

> > I see DB2 classes on the education schedule in Seattle offered by IBM. Why the > "requirement" for third-party training? When your execs make a database decision, > what is the business driver/justification behind insisting on third-party training? > Personally, if I were the exec, I'd rather have it from the company that makes the > product. > Best check if those courses [listed on the site] are being performed at an IBM facility or at a 3rd party location. Why pay IBM prices only to end up with the course being delivered at a 3rd party center? You may end up with an IBM trainer, but that is where it ends in many cases. sending to informix-list