Re: {Spam?} RE: {Spam?} RE: Informix Roundup: 13 February 2009

Ian Michael Gumby wrote: > Geez! > > Sounds like someone woke up on the wrong side of the bed... No, I'm just sick of your constant bitching without any constructive effort. I'm also sick of your bitching about everything anyone does without actually doing anything yourself. > My comment was to the king of wankers. > Do I have a problem with your blog? Nope. "I don't have any such interest and my point was that if you're just going to google any net new links since your last search, you should really take the time to do your homework." If you're so fucking good and you've got the time to do it better, then fucking do it yourself. > Do I have problem with you? Nope. > > My point about your blog is that some of the stuff isn't positive. As opposed to your fucking useful and positive bitching, you mean? > With respect to the Informix book blog, I thought it funny that it was > blocked as inappropriate content. Yeah, and you made it sound like clicking on it would be a bad thing. Whereas it's not, it's a nice, positive and constructive review of Informix books. Which you immediately fucking moaned about as well, saying the books were all out of date. > With respect to the Army Win, yes you did post about it, and then I > found it in Jerry Keesee's presentation. It wasn't a win at all. Oh well, fucking sue me. > Do I expect more from you? naw, you're a clown. I expect you to just > clown around. > Do I expect more from Jerry K and IBM? You bet your sweet ass I do. I wonder why Jerry K isn't on his knees at the moment slurping on your pink pole of wisdom? Could it be because you don't have any? > There's a difference. I'm not talking about spending billions on > marketing or trying to compete head to head with Sun's MySQL or Oracle. > But what I do expect is a tad more intelligence and thought behind their > actions. In YOUR FUCKING OPINION. Right now, Sun is looking like they're a bit fucked, Oracle is posting mediocre numbers and IBM (cunts that they are) have posted great numbers. Despite the fact that they never listen to the great Gumby. > I also said that I don't have a vested interest in writing a blog about > Informix. Heck, my contracts for the past couple of gigs have been > Oracle based. I'm getting calls if I know C# and .Net with SQLServer. So > why should I dedicate a blog to IDS? IBM doesn't write my paycheck so > why should I give them free marketing support? You do nothing for IBM, so why should they listen to you? The fact that you're not doing any Informix work makes me wonder why the fuck you're so keen to share your opinions with us? Why don't you go piss off the SQLServer and Oracle newsgroups and fucking leave us alone? I DO have a vested interest in writing a blog about Informix: I like it and I want it to do well. It's not much, but at least I'm taking the trouble to actually do something, rather than just sitting there and spouting off about how everyone else is wrong and I'm right. You never actually DO anything, you just sit there telling everyone else how they're doing it wrong. It's fucking insulting. Either show us how it's done /by doing it/, or SHUT THE FUCK UP. -- Cheers, Obnoxio The Clown http://obotheclown.blogspot.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by OpenProtect(http://www.openprotect.com), and is believed to be clean.