Re: HELP : S.E (7.x) nearly faster than OWS (7.x)
Mariusz Malogrosz wrote: > = > I did a benchmark test a while ago , comapring > WS , OL, SE . Using hp9000 , 1 GB ram , 2 CPU's . > The test consisted of a simulation running a 4gl order entry > application using benchmarking tool called Mercury Loadrunner. > I run 10, 20 , 30, 40 and 50 user tests , bottom line was > the difference was minimal OL was 1.01868 % faster then SE and > same as WS . Note this is a OLTP app , DSS may be different ... > = > Question how many CPU's do you have , my theory is that I have one CPU (MIPS 10000 at 200MHZ + $MB 2nd levl. chache), and it=B4s a OLTP system with $GL programing > on 2 CPU machine there is little benefit , things change as you get int= o > large databases and many CPU's .... I know PDQ is great for DSS ... > = > Mariusz > = > MARTIN <ramp@arrakis.es> wrote in article <35088D80.32CE70DB@arrakis.es= >... > > After the tuning of on Line Work Group Server 7.20UC2 in a Siemens > > machine with 256 i have compared performance : S.E and OWGS have the > > same performance . > > > > I can not understad . Do you? > > > > I have all in on line : buffer o.k , kaio , access to two disk , smal= l > > check point , temp dbspaces , raw devices > >