Re: No future for DB2
Posted in 2005
Topics: General Discussion
"Noons" <wizofoz2k@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message news:1122860508.096036.267240@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > > > Well, this is not comp.databases. > It is comp.databases.oracle.server. > Stuff them. no - it's comp.databases.ibm-db2 and comp.databases.informix AND comp.databases
Madison Pruet wrote: > "Noons" <wizofoz2k@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message > news:1122860508.096036.267240@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > >> >>Well, this is not comp.databases. >>It is comp.databases.oracle.server. >>Stuff them. > > > no - it's comp.databases.ibm-db2 and comp.databases.informix AND > comp.databases You will find the ability to read of great value if your career is in IT. And you are not correct. Perhaps your reader is truncated the name but it is indeed c.d.o.server. -- Daniel A. Morgan http://www.psoug.org damorgan@x.washington.edu (replace x with u to respond)
> > > > no - it's comp.databases.ibm-db2 and comp.databases.informix AND > > comp.databases > > You will find the ability to read of great value if your career is in > IT. And you are not correct. Perhaps your reader is truncated the name > but it is indeed c.d.o.server. > -- ARGGGGGGHHHH!!! Dang it - you're right. #%$#@#$*()@@#$&%((($(#$$
Madison Pruet wrote: >>>no - it's comp.databases.ibm-db2 and comp.databases.informix AND >>>comp.databases >> >>You will find the ability to read of great value if your career is in >>IT. And you are not correct. Perhaps your reader is truncated the name >>but it is indeed c.d.o.server. >>-- > > ARGGGGGGHHHH!!! > > Dang it - you're right. #%$#@#$*()@@#$&%((($(#$$ Yeah like I don't totally embarrased myself on a regular basis. For example my mangled verbiage above. -- Daniel A. Morgan http://www.psoug.org damorgan@x.washington.edu (replace x with u to respond)