Re: Resident Memory larger then expected
Posted in 2009
I haven't yet overrun SHMTOTAL on an 11.50 instance since I always set
SHMTOTAL to zero (unlimited) now, but in the past, if the engine wanted more
virtual memory and SHMTOTAL was exhausted, the instance shutdown or hung. I
know that there was an old feature request for the instance to just keep
going but error out whatever operation required the additional memory, but I
don't know if that was ever implemented. The last time I hit the limit was
in an early 7.31 instance.
Art
Art S. Kagel
Oninit (www.oninit.com)
IIUG Board of Directors (art@iiug.org)
See you at the 2010 IIUG Informix Conference
April 25-28, 2010
Overland Park (Kansas City), KS
www.iiug.org/conf
Disclaimer: Please keep in mind that my own opinions are my own opinions and
do not reflect on my employer, Oninit, the IIUG, nor any other organization
with which I am associated either explicitly or implicitly. Neither do
those opinions reflect those of other individuals affiliated with any entity
with which I am affiliated nor those of the entities themselves.
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Habichtsberg, Reinhard <
RHabichtsberg@arz-emmendingen.de> wrote:
> Hello Superboer,
>
> good hint! I changed LOCKS from 4,000,000 to 10,000 and now only 49152 KB
> for the resident portion were allocated. What happens if the server
> allocates more locks in 1,000,000 portions as I have seen before and memory
> is limited to e.g. 1024000 KB (SHMTOTAL)?
>
> Regards,
> Reinhard.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: informix-list-bounces@iiug.org
> > [mailto:informix-list-bounces@iiug.org]On Behalf Of Superboer
> > Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 1:07 PM
> > To: informix-list@iiug.org
> > Subject: Re: Resident Memory larger then expected
> >
> >
> > Hello Reinhard.
> >
> > how many locks did you set in onconfig; this one will also be in the
> > resident portion
> > among other stuff.
> >
> > > In earlier versions of IDS the formular was BUFFERS x 2 =
> > Size in KB. I had...
> >
> > hmm not really earlier versions had also locks in resident also
> > logbuff and physbuf etc...
> >
> > Superboer
> >
> > On 11 dec, 12:55, "Habichtsberg, Reinhard" <RHabichtsb...@arz-
> > emmendingen.de> wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > in onconfig I set
> > >
> > > BUFFERPOOL> > >
> > size=2K,buffers=20000,lrus=8,lru_min_dirty=20.000000,lru_max_d
> > irty=30.000000
> > > .
> > >
> > > In the message log I see:
> > > Memory sizes:resident:570368 KB
> > >
> > > In earlier versions of IDS the formular was BUFFERS x 2 =
> > Size in KB. I had
> > > expected memory size resident: 40000 KB.
> > >
> > > What's the reason for the difference and how can I handle it.
> > >
> > > IDS11.50FC5W4 in Solaris 10
> > >
> > > TIA,
> > > Reinhard.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Informix-list mailing list
> > Informix-list@iiug.org
> > http://www.iiug.org/mailman/listinfo/informix-list
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Informix-list mailing list
> Informix-list@iiug.org
> http://www.iiug.org/mailman/listinfo/informix-list
>