Re: Oracle 10G

Obnoxio The Clown wrote: > What are you talking about? You talked about hash partitioned tables, not > transparent failover. And many different types of partitioning have been in > IDS for years. You then tried to imply some sort of grid-ness, because > these might be on different vendors' disks.... Wrong part of this wide-ranging thread. The original comment about hashing was a side-topic. -- Daniel Morgan http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/oad/oad_crs.asp http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/aoa/aoa_crs.asp damorgan@x.washington.edu (replace 'x' with a 'u' to reply)

Daniel Morgan wrote: > Obnoxio The Clown wrote: > >> What are you talking about? You talked about hash partitioned tables, not >> transparent failover. And many different types of partitioning have been >> in IDS for years. You then tried to imply some sort of grid-ness, because >> these might be on different vendors' disks.... > > Wrong part of this wide-ranging thread. The original comment about > hashing was a side-topic. Well, pay attention to where you post observations like this then! :o) -- "C'est pas parce qu'on n'a rien ' dire qu'il faut fermer sa gueule" - Coluche