On-Archie or OnBar ??

Posted in 1999

Informix@wor.tvp.com.pl — Thu, 29 Apr 1999 09:39:52 +0200 — source: Informix-list mailing list archive (1991-1998)

Hi, We are going to migrate from 5.x to 7.3 ( Digital UNIX ) I went through manuals and more or less know functionality. I am interested in opinions based on experience (stability and reliability)

↪ replying to Informix@wor.tvp.com.pl

Neil Truby — Thu, 29 Apr 1999 10:13:15 +0100 — source: Informix-list mailing list archive (1991-1998)

Informix@wor.tvp.com.pl wrote in message <7g94ko$f3d$1@news.xmission.com>... > >Hi, > > We are going to migrate from 5.x to 7.3 ( Digital UNIX ) > I went through manuals and more or less know functionality. > I am interested in opinions based on experience (stability and reliability) Opinion: You would be better off printing out all your data and micro-ficheing it than using onarchive.

↪ replying to Informix@wor.tvp.com.pl

Derek Runstadler — Mon, 3 May 1999 06:13:32 -0700 — source: Informix-list mailing list archive (1991-1998)

We have been using Onarchive successfully and happily for about 2 years on 15 instances. I'm not sure why almost all the posts on Onarchive flame it, as it doesn't appear to be any more complicated than Onbar to me. We do plan to migrate to Onbar. -- Derek Runstadler Informix@wor.tvp.com.pl wrote in message <7g94ko$f3d$1@news.xmission.com>... > >Hi, > > We are going to migrate from 5.x to 7.3 ( Digital UNIX ) > I went through manuals and more or less know functionality. > I am interested in opinions based on experience (stability and reliability)

Glossary

onbar