Re: question about compression with IConnect
Posted in 2006
Starship Solutions has a product that does a secure DR for Informix and I know they where looking at adding or had added compression to speed transfer. I'm not aware of any tool that does the server to server compression. Eric B. Rowell On 9/28/06, Fernando Nunes <spam@domus.online.pt> wrote: > Vivien Kobayashi wrote: > > Is anyone aware of any way of compressing the data using IConnect or > > any middleware? > > > > In our current environment, we have quite a few clients connected to > > our 9.4 IDS via WAN. > > The windows GUI client application is written in MFC which uses a DLL > > that connects to the server using ESQL/C. The ESQL/C uses IConnect > > version 2.81tc3. > > > > The performance on the server is sufficient (CPU is usually 90% idle). > > The performance for the LAN clients is sufficient; however, the > > performance for the remote clients is not. > > > > Our main MFC developer has performed experiments by writing his own > > middle layer with compression instead of connecting using IConnect. > > These experiments show that IConnect is a major bottleneck. While the > > native speed of the WAN links is indeed slower than the LAN, the > > experiements got the WAN performance level up to an accetptable level. > > However, this was only an experiment, and not pursued to develop a full > > solution due to the complexity and cost of the implementation. We've > > then talked to IBM/Informix but it did not go anywhere. The primary > > suggestion we got is to move from HDR to ER but the complication and > > the cost of ER is not preferrable at this point. > > > > Our version of ideal solution is that the IConnect layer can be > > optimized, potentially with built-in compression. However, it seems > > compression is available but only among the servers participated in the > > ER. Why isn't it available to the client connection? has anybody knew > > or written any middle layer for compression to deal with the WAN > > traffic? Any suggestion is appreciated. > > > > Thank you. > > > > -Vivien Kobayashi > > > > Are you sure your application is doing the right thing? > An example: Zip Code and it's description. If your application gets all the Zip-description table, waiting for the user to fill in the Zip Code to show the description it can lead to heavy data exchange between the client and the server... If it makes the query after getting the zip code from the user, it may have a slight delay, but the data exchanged will be much less. > > The question you should ask is: The data that the user sees on screen justifies the slowness of the application? Did they use local or remote cursors...? etc. > I don't think you've posted the bandwidth of the WAN links, but compare that with the visible data on the application screen and decide if it's reasonable... > > I recall a case where a customer was using MS environments, and there were some options (local/remote cursors if I recall correctly) that could make a huge difference... > > > Regards. > > -- > Fernando Nunes > Portugal > > http://informix-technology.blogspot.com > My email works... but I don't check it frequently... > _______________________________________________ > Informix-list mailing list > Informix-list@iiug.org > http://www.iiug.org/mailman/listinfo/informix-list >