Re: waiting for log buffer??
Posted in 2003
Topics: General Discussion
james wrote:
> There are 8 log files of 500 MB each.
I'd prefer 80 at 50Mb. Apart from the water marks, there's another
granularity effect that kicks in that might be a problem with only 8.
Probably doubtful though...
Waiting for a log buffer .... hmmmmm.
Exactly what is in the load script? How is it being loaded? Just a plain
LOAD statement in SQL, or are you using dbload?
--
Hell hath no imppotent fury like a geek scorned.
The 'load' is really a select into, creating aggregates for a weekly
summary. However, at the point where trouble ocurrs, the load script
is building an index on a temporary table.
What could hold up a log buffer flush, or what would prevent access to
a log buffer? I imagine a log switch would prevent access to a log
buffer, if they were all full at that point in execution. But I can't
fathom how that could happen. And it was not a short period of time
where other sessions were in stasis, it was minutes.
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 12:11:16 +1000, "Andrew Hamm" <ahamm@mail.com>
wrote:
>james wrote:
>> There are 8 log files of 500 MB each.
>
>I'd prefer 80 at 50Mb. Apart from the water marks, there's another
>granularity effect that kicks in that might be a problem with only 8.
>Probably doubtful though...
>
>Waiting for a log buffer .... hmmmmm.
>
>Exactly what is in the load script? How is it being loaded? Just a plain
>LOAD statement in SQL, or are you using dbload?
Regards,
James White
white_a_james@notsohotmail.com